Difference between revisions of "Talk:Radio"

Revision as of 14:35, 21 August 2011

Is Radio part of Help Voice?

ValterAlves 15:02, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

It should not. It is the purpose of the exploration that should be addressed, not the means.

Cases of use of a radio device with the intent of convey messages from a Helper Voice fit that pattern.

Radio relates to the use of broadcasted radio emission, which are not perceived as targeting the PC, even if (indirectly) they carry useful information.

ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

Is it worth it?

I'm sensing that this pattern will reveal to specific to deserve reaching the deck. But I'm also feeling that I should go on with its specification so that I will be able to use it as an example of a pattern that is too specific to be interesting to be considered. ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

This is more a collection of instance of some other pattern

ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

Question is: which pattern? Which is the pattern from this is an instance? I none, could it be the case that there is another pattern (that one) that we did not realise before?

ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

No. It is not a instance of a (single) pattern. The examples point to several different explorations. But yes, it may me too specific. Or not.

ValterAlves 15:19, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

in that case the discussion [[#Is Radio part of Help Voice?:above]] should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie)

ValterAlves 15:35, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

If the door is open to communicators, shouldn't they all be allowed? And in that case what would the name of the pattern be? Still Radio?

ValterAlves 15:35, 21 August 2011 (WEST)