Difference between revisions of "Talk:Radio"

From SoundInGames.com - Sound Design in Games
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Is Radio part of Help Voice?)
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:It should not. It is the purpose of the exploration that should be addressed, not the means.
 
:It should not. It is the purpose of the exploration that should be addressed, not the means.
 
:Cases of use of a radio device with the intent of convey messages from a [[Helper Voice]] fit that pattern.
 
:Cases of use of a radio device with the intent of convey messages from a [[Helper Voice]] fit that pattern.
:[[Radio]] relates to the use of broadcasted radio emission, which are not ''perceived'' as targeting the PC, even if they carry useful information
+
:[[Radio]] relates to the use of broadcasted radio emission, which are not ''perceived'' as targeting the PC, even if (indirectly) they carry useful information.
 
:[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)
 
:[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)
  

Revision as of 14:02, 21 August 2011

Is Radio part of Help Voice?

ValterAlves 15:02, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

It should not. It is the purpose of the exploration that should be addressed, not the means.
Cases of use of a radio device with the intent of convey messages from a Helper Voice fit that pattern.
Radio relates to the use of broadcasted radio emission, which are not perceived as targeting the PC, even if (indirectly) they carry useful information.
ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

Is it worth it?

I'm sensing that this pattern will reveal to specific to deserve reaching the deck. But I'm also feeling that I should go on with its specification so that I will be able to use it as an example of a pattern that is too specific to be interesting to be considered. ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)

This is more a collection of instance of some other pattern
ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)
Question is: which pattern? Which is the pattern from this is an instance? I none, could it be the case that there is another pattern (that one) that we did not realise before?
ValterAlves 15:01, 21 August 2011 (WEST)