Difference between revisions of "Talk:Most Frequently Used"
From SoundInGames.com - Sound Design in Games
ValterAlves (Talk | contribs) m (Created page with "==Should make more sense== This listing is being constructed in a empirical way, to date. It would be valuable that we included some mechanism to allow people to express their ow...") |
ValterAlves (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It would be valuable that we included some mechanism to allow people to express their own rankings, possibly accompanied by discussion, so that this would make more sense | It would be valuable that we included some mechanism to allow people to express their own rankings, possibly accompanied by discussion, so that this would make more sense | ||
| − | =='More' does | + | =='More' does *not* mean 'better'!== |
When identifying frequency we are not implying significance. Also frequency of cards/patterns may be depended of game genre (well, they are), which in turn are not played with the same frequency. | When identifying frequency we are not implying significance. Also frequency of cards/patterns may be depended of game genre (well, they are), which in turn are not played with the same frequency. | ||
We could have another ranking expressing a idea closer to 'it would be interesting to have more of this' instead of 'I usually find this' | We could have another ranking expressing a idea closer to 'it would be interesting to have more of this' instead of 'I usually find this' | ||
Maybe, in a similar way to what we have suggested above, we should people enter they feelings regarding this matter. | Maybe, in a similar way to what we have suggested above, we should people enter they feelings regarding this matter. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 28 September 2011
Should make more sense
This listing is being constructed in a empirical way, to date. It would be valuable that we included some mechanism to allow people to express their own rankings, possibly accompanied by discussion, so that this would make more sense
'More' does *not* mean 'better'!
When identifying frequency we are not implying significance. Also frequency of cards/patterns may be depended of game genre (well, they are), which in turn are not played with the same frequency. We could have another ranking expressing a idea closer to 'it would be interesting to have more of this' instead of 'I usually find this' Maybe, in a similar way to what we have suggested above, we should people enter they feelings regarding this matter.
