Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emotional Script"

From SoundInGames.com - Sound Design in Games
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Created page with "==Better Name?== Emotional Script is a name that better fits our initial idea of what the design pattern would cover. Still we've been noticing that the name does not always ...")
 
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Emotional Script]] is a name that better fits our initial idea of what the design pattern would cover. Still we've been noticing that the name does not always fit in a sentence where it was supposed to. Considering that one of the major goals of this design patterns is to contribute for the identification of a relevant domain [[vocabulary]], this is an important matter.<br />
 
[[Emotional Script]] is a name that better fits our initial idea of what the design pattern would cover. Still we've been noticing that the name does not always fit in a sentence where it was supposed to. Considering that one of the major goals of this design patterns is to contribute for the identification of a relevant domain [[vocabulary]], this is an important matter.<br />
 
'Emotional'? yes? 'Script'? Not necessarily. Most of the times we are thinking to a moment or state, not to the entire script. That is, something less macro.<br />
 
'Emotional'? yes? 'Script'? Not necessarily. Most of the times we are thinking to a moment or state, not to the entire script. That is, something less macro.<br />
[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 18:46, 11 August 2011 (WEST)
+
[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 
: So... 'Emotional State'?, 'Emotion'? 'Emotions'?<br />
 
: So... 'Emotional State'?, 'Emotion'? 'Emotions'?<br />
: [[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 18:46, 11 August 2011 (WEST)
+
: [[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]

Latest revision as of 15:59, 25 September 2011

Better Name?

Emotional Script is a name that better fits our initial idea of what the design pattern would cover. Still we've been noticing that the name does not always fit in a sentence where it was supposed to. Considering that one of the major goals of this design patterns is to contribute for the identification of a relevant domain vocabulary, this is an important matter.
'Emotional'? yes? 'Script'? Not necessarily. Most of the times we are thinking to a moment or state, not to the entire script. That is, something less macro.
ValterAlves [pre-release]

So... 'Emotional State'?, 'Emotion'? 'Emotions'?
ValterAlves [pre-release]