Difference between revisions of "Talk:Narrative"
From SoundInGames.com - Sound Design in Games
ValterAlves (Talk | contribs) m |
ValterAlves (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Is this an "aggregator card"?== | ==Is this an "aggregator card"?== | ||
| − | + | follow the discussion [http://www.example.com pending link] | |
[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 23:28, 13 August 2011 (WEST) | [[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 23:28, 13 August 2011 (WEST) | ||
Revision as of 23:29, 13 August 2011
Frontiers to the concept of Narrative
I believe we were too relaxed about the criteria for what contributes to Narrative. The original mindset was that any sound exploration that could 'tell' how things were evolving or the interpretation of NPC on past and present events could fit. Indirectly this would apply to the macro-Emotional Script too.
Meanwhile we recognize that such loose definition would eventually leave very few outside.
So, in order to make the card usefull, we are considering narrowing the definition to those exploration that more pragmatically build the prose of the game.
ValterAlves 23:28, 13 August 2011 (WEST)
Is this an "aggregator card"?
follow the discussion pending link ValterAlves 23:28, 13 August 2011 (WEST)
