Difference between revisions of "Talk:Acoustic Ecology"
From SoundInGames.com - Sound Design in Games
ValterAlves (Talk | contribs) m (Acoustic Ecology contains an umbrella concept. As such, should it be deprecated?) |
ValterAlves (Talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== [[Acoustic Ecology]] contains an umbrella concept. As such, should it be deprecated? == | == [[Acoustic Ecology]] contains an umbrella concept. As such, should it be deprecated? == | ||
− | We concluded [http://www.example.com [pending]] that 'umbrella concepts' (or 'aggregator concepts'), | + | We concluded [http://www.example.com [pending]] that 'umbrella concepts' (or 'aggregator concepts'), even if constituting meaningful design patterns, were not very effective as cards (see why [[here]]). Still, has we say in the description, [[Acoustic Ecology]] is a most influential card/concept/pattern. It would feel strange if were not part of the deck... On the other hand it should not remain there just to 'make justice' to the overall role of the concept. Hard decision... |
+ | [[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 02:37, 11 August 2011 (WEST) |
Revision as of 02:39, 11 August 2011
Acoustic Ecology contains an umbrella concept. As such, should it be deprecated?
We concluded [pending] that 'umbrella concepts' (or 'aggregator concepts'), even if constituting meaningful design patterns, were not very effective as cards (see why here). Still, has we say in the description, Acoustic Ecology is a most influential card/concept/pattern. It would feel strange if were not part of the deck... On the other hand it should not remain there just to 'make justice' to the overall role of the concept. Hard decision... ValterAlves 02:37, 11 August 2011 (WEST)