Difference between revisions of "Talk:Narrative"

From SoundInGames.com - Sound Design in Games
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Frontiers to the concept of Narrative==  
+
==[[Narrative]]: concept frontiers==  
 
I believe we were too relaxed about the criteria for what contributes to Narrative. The original mindset was that any sound exploration that could 'tell' how things were evolving or the interpretation of NPC on past and present events could fit. Indirectly this would apply to the macro-[[Emotional Script]] too.<br />  
 
I believe we were too relaxed about the criteria for what contributes to Narrative. The original mindset was that any sound exploration that could 'tell' how things were evolving or the interpretation of NPC on past and present events could fit. Indirectly this would apply to the macro-[[Emotional Script]] too.<br />  
 
Meanwhile we recognize that such loose definition would eventually leave very few outside.<br />
 
Meanwhile we recognize that such loose definition would eventually leave very few outside.<br />
So, in order to make the card usefull, we are considering narrowing the definition to those exploration that more pragmatically build the prose of the game.
+
So, in order to make the card usefull, we are considering narrowing the definition to those explorations that more pragmatically build the prose of the game.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 23:28, 13 August 2011 (WEST)
+
  
 
==Is this an "aggregator card"?==
 
==Is this an "aggregator card"?==
folloe the discussion [http://www.example.com pending link]
+
follow the discussion [http://www.example.com pending link]<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] 23:28, 13 August 2011 (WEST)
+

Latest revision as of 22:22, 26 October 2011

Narrative: concept frontiers

I believe we were too relaxed about the criteria for what contributes to Narrative. The original mindset was that any sound exploration that could 'tell' how things were evolving or the interpretation of NPC on past and present events could fit. Indirectly this would apply to the macro-Emotional Script too.
Meanwhile we recognize that such loose definition would eventually leave very few outside.
So, in order to make the card usefull, we are considering narrowing the definition to those explorations that more pragmatically build the prose of the game.
ValterAlves [pre-release]

Is this an "aggregator card"?

follow the discussion pending link
ValterAlves [pre-release]