Talk:Radio - Revision history

ValterAlves at 16:19, 4 January 2012

2012-01-04T16:19:15Z

ValterAlves at 16:18, 4 January 2012

2012-01-04T16:18:10Z

ValterAlves: /* Is it worth it? */

2012-01-04T16:13:45Z

‎Is it worth it?

ValterAlves: /* Is Radio part of Helper Voice? */

2012-01-04T16:08:54Z

‎Is Radio part of Helper Voice?

ValterAlves at 10:45, 14 October 2011

2011-10-14T10:45:25Z

ValterAlves: /* Is it worth it? */

2011-10-04T19:07:00Z

‎Is it worth it?

ValterAlves at 19:04, 4 October 2011

2011-10-04T19:04:58Z

ValterAlves: /* Is Radio part of Help Voice? */

2011-10-04T13:31:43Z

‎Is Radio part of Help Voice?

ValterAlves at 15:03, 25 September 2011

2011-09-25T15:03:44Z

ValterAlves at 15:03, 25 September 2011

2011-09-25T15:03:10Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :: Question is: which pattern? Which is the pattern from this is an instance? I none, could it be the case that there is another pattern (that one) that we did not realise before? <br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :: No. It is not a instance of a (single) pattern. The examples point to several different explorations. But yes, it may be too specific. Or not.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
-::: in that case the discussion 'Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?' (above) should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie).<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
+::: In that case the discussion 'Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?' (above) should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie).<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :::: If the door is open to communicators, shouldn't they all be allowed? And in that case what would the name of the pattern be? "Radio", still?<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 : This is more a collection of instance of some other pattern.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :: Question is: which pattern? Which is the pattern from this is an instance? I none, could it be the case that there is another pattern (that one) that we did not realise before? <br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
-:: No. It is not a instance of a (single) pattern. The examples point to several different explorations. But yes, it may me too specific. Or not.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
+:: No. It is not a instance of a (single) pattern. The examples point to several different explorations. But yes, it may be too specific. Or not.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 ::: in that case the discussion 'Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?' (above) should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie).<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :::: If the door is open to communicators, shouldn't they all be allowed? And in that case what would the name of the pattern be? "Radio", still?<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ==Is it worth it?==
 I'm sensing that this pattern will reveal to specific to deserve reaching the deck. But I'm also feeling that I should go on with its specification so that I will be able to use it as an example of a pattern that is too specific to be interesting to be considered.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
-: This is more a collection of instance of some other pattern<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
+: This is more a collection of instance of some other pattern.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :: Question is: which pattern? Which is the pattern from this is an instance? I none, could it be the case that there is another pattern (that one) that we did not realise before? <br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :: No. It is not a instance of a (single) pattern. The examples point to several different explorations. But yes, it may me too specific. Or not.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
-::: in that case the discussion 'Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?' (above) should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie)<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
+::: in that case the discussion 'Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?' (above) should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie).<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :::: If the door is open to communicators, shouldn't they all be allowed? And in that case what would the name of the pattern be? "Radio", still?<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :It should not. It is the purpose of the exploration that should be addressed, not the means.
-:Cases of use of a radio device with the intent of convey messages from a [[Helper Voice]] fit that pattern.
+:Cases of use of a [[Radio]] device with the intent of convey messages from a [[Helper Voice]] fit that pattern.
 :[[Radio]] relates to the use of broadcasted radio emission, which are not ''perceived'' as targeting the PC, even if (indirectly) they carry useful information.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :: No. It is not a instance of a (single) pattern. The examples point to several different explorations. But yes, it may me too specific. Or not.<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 ::: in that case the discussion 'Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?' (above) should be reformulated: Radio is one way to implement Helper Voice, and in that case it address directly the PC and may be a communicator (walkie-talkie)<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
-:::: If the door is open to communicators, shouldn't they all be allowed? And in that case what would the name of the pattern be? Still Radio?<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
+:::: If the door is open to communicators, shouldn't they all be allowed? And in that case what would the name of the pattern be? "Radio", still?<br />[[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Is [[Radio]] part of [[Help Voice]]?==
+==Is [[Radio]] part of [[Helper Voice]]?==
 [[User:ValterAlves|ValterAlves]] [pre-release]
 :It should not. It is the purpose of the exploration that should be addressed, not the means.