R-A-E-D Iterations - Revision history

ValterAlves at 05:37, 27 August 2012

2012-08-27T05:37:04Z

ValterAlves at 05:32, 27 August 2012

2012-08-27T05:32:32Z

ValterAlves at 05:25, 27 August 2012

2012-08-27T05:25:57Z

ValterAlves at 12:47, 26 August 2012

2012-08-26T12:47:43Z

ValterAlves at 12:43, 26 August 2012

2012-08-26T12:43:49Z

ValterAlves at 12:41, 26 August 2012

2012-08-26T12:41:00Z

ValterAlves at 12:35, 26 August 2012

2012-08-26T12:35:28Z

ValterAlves at 03:14, 26 August 2012

2012-08-26T03:14:18Z

ValterAlves at 19:36, 24 August 2012

2012-08-24T19:36:38Z

ValterAlves at 02:13, 25 May 2012

2012-05-25T02:13:37Z

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 | examples=
-{{NoVideo|'''Need for Speed: Undercover:'''In these example the sequence "Relaxation → Engagement → Decay" is perceptible.}}
+{{NoVideo|'''Need for Speed: Undercover: '''In these example the sequence "Relaxation → Engagement → Decay" is perceptible.}}
 | ex1=<mt p="RAED" g="Far Cry 2" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">In this game it is notorious the use of the complete sequence with the four phases. Naturally, from the phase of [[Anticipation]] it is possible to get back to [[Relaxation]], if [[Engagement]] is avoided.</mt>
 <!--| exX=<mt p="RAED" g="NFSUndercover" g="Need for Speed: Undercover" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}></mt>-->

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 {{NoVideo|'''Need for Speed: Undercover:'''In these example the sequence "Relaxation → Engagement → Decay" is perceptible.}}
 | ex1=<mt p="RAED" g="Far Cry 2" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">In this game it is notorious the use of the complete sequence with the four phases. Naturally, from the phase of [[Anticipation]] it is possible to get back to [[Relaxation]], if [[Engagement]] is avoided.</mt>
-<!--| ex2=<mt p="RAED" g="NFSUndercover" g="Need for Speed: Undercover" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}></mt>-->
+<!--| exX=<mt p="RAED" g="NFSUndercover" g="Need for Speed: Undercover" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}></mt>-->
-| ex3=<mt p="RAED" g="Papa Sangre" w="{{ViPhoneH}}" h="{{ViPhoneW}}">A three-phase sequence is perceptible. What is more, if we opt to interpret that there is never exactly an [[Engagement]] – in this game the actual [[Engagement]] is equal to [[Death]] – but instead a possible second degree of [[Anticipation]] (of getting caught, once spotted and if not able to outrun the pursuer), then the sequence is more like: "... → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → ...".</mt>
+| ex2=<mt p="RAED" g="Papa Sangre" w="{{ViPhoneH}}" h="{{ViPhoneW}}">A three-phase sequence is perceptible. What is more, if we opt to interpret that there is never exactly an [[Engagement]] – in this game the actual [[Engagement]] is equal to [[Death]] – but instead a possible second degree of [[Anticipation]] (of getting caught, once spotted and if not able to outrun the pursuer), then the sequence is more like: "... → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → ...".</mt>
-| ex4=<mt p="SeekingForPC" g="Oblivion" altg="The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">A simpler but very noticeable two-phase sequence: "... → Relaxation → Engagement → Relaxation → ...". Basically, [[Relaxation]] is substituted by [[Engagement]] while a conflict is happening.</mt>
+| ex3=<mt p="SeekingForPC" g="Oblivion" altg="The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">A simpler but very noticeable two-phase sequence: "... → Relaxation → Engagement → Relaxation → ...". Basically, [[Relaxation]] is substituted by [[Engagement]] while a conflict is happening.</mt>
 | external=
 Emblematic examples of this sequence in movie:

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 | examples=
 | ex1=<mt p="RAED" g="Far Cry 2" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">In this game it is notorious the use of the complete sequence with the four phases. Naturally, from the phase of [[Anticipation]] it is possible to get back to [[Relaxation]], if [[Engagement]] is avoided.</mt>
-| ex2=<mt p="RAED" g="NFSUndercover" g="Need for Speed: Undercover" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}>In these example the sequence "Relaxation → Engagement → Decay" is perceptible.</mt>
+<!--| ex2=<mt p="RAED" g="NFSUndercover" g="Need for Speed: Undercover" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}></mt>-->
 | ex3=<mt p="RAED" g="Papa Sangre" w="{{ViPhoneH}}" h="{{ViPhoneW}}">A three-phase sequence is perceptible. What is more, if we opt to interpret that there is never exactly an [[Engagement]] – in this game the actual [[Engagement]] is equal to [[Death]] – but instead a possible second degree of [[Anticipation]] (of getting caught, once spotted and if not able to outrun the pursuer), then the sequence is more like: "... → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → ...".</mt>
 | ex4=<mt p="SeekingForPC" g="Oblivion" altg="The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">A simpler but very noticeable two-phase sequence: "... → Relaxation → Engagement → Relaxation → ...". Basically, [[Relaxation]] is substituted by [[Engagement]] while a conflict is happening.</mt>

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 | showrefs =1
 | RevisionsInNameOrDeprecation=
-This is one of the patterns included in our seminal collection <ref name="AlvesAM2010" /> but it was presented with another name: "Entrainment". Meanwhile we realized three things:
+This is one of the patterns included in our seminal collection <ref name="AlvesAM10"/> but it was presented with another name: "Entrainment". Meanwhile we realized three things:
 * In this pattern, entrainment is the "means", not the solution. Considering that the name of a pattern should reflect the solution (not the means), "Entrainment" was not adequate name.
 * We are not aware of any explicit reference to the iteration of phases this pattern addresses, so we don’t know of a name that is already used to express it. Consequently we had to define it ourselves ("R-A-E-D Iterations" as it stands now), which in this particular circumstance was a challenge that still remains open.
 * [[Entrainment]] is indeed a pattern – another pattern. (A pattern that this one makes use of.)
 }}

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 | showrefs =1
 | RevisionsInNameOrDeprecation=
-This is one of the patterns included in our seminal collection <ref name="Alves2010" /> but it was presented with another name: "Entrainment". Meanwhile we realized three things:
+This is one of the patterns included in our seminal collection <ref name="AlvesAM2010" /> but it was presented with another name: "Entrainment". Meanwhile we realized three things:
 * In this pattern, entrainment is the "means", not the solution. Considering that the name of a pattern should reflect the solution (not the means), "Entrainment" was not adequate name.
 * We are not aware of any explicit reference to the iteration of phases this pattern addresses, so we don’t know of a name that is already used to express it. Consequently we had to define it ourselves ("R-A-E-D Iterations" as it stands now), which in this particular circumstance was a challenge that still remains open.
 * [[Entrainment]] is indeed a pattern – another pattern. (A pattern that this one makes use of.)
 }}

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 | revisions =
-This is one of the patterns included in our [[seminal collection]] <ref name="AlvesAM10" /> but it was presented with another name: "Entrainment". Meanwhile we realised three things:
+This is one of the patterns included in our [[seminal collection]] <ref name="AlvesAM10"/> but it was presented with another name: "Entrainment". Meanwhile we realised three things:
 # In this pattern, entrainment is the "means", not the solution. Considering that the name of a pattern [[Anatomy of a Pattern#Style_guide_for_the_card_format|should reflect the solution]] (not the means), "Entrainment" was not adequate name.
 # We are not aware of any explicit reference to the iteration of phases this pattern addresses, so we don't know of a name that is already used to express it. Consequently we had to define it ourselves ("[[R-A-E-D Iterations]]" as it stands now), which in this particular circumstance was a challenge that still [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#aboutthename|remains open]].

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 *the scene known as “Apologize to my mule”<ref name="apologizetomymule"/> in A Fistful of Dollars<ref name="afistfulofdollars"/>.
 | showrefs =1
 }}

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 | v20rel3=[[Entrainment]]<br>
 | description=
-[[Relaxation]], [[Anticipation]], [[Engagement]], and [[Decay]] can be used in a iterated sequence, such as:
+[[Relaxation]], [[Anticipation]], [[Engagement]], and [[Decay]] can be used in an iterated sequence, such as:
 '''''...→Relaxation→Anticipation→Engagement→Decay→Relaxation→Anticipation→Engagement→Decay&rarr;Relaxation→...'''''<br />
 Due to the difficulties in designing and coding the intelligence for the phase of [[Anticipation]], the following simpler version is more common:
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 | examples=
-| ex1=<mt p="RAED" g="Far Cry 2" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">In this game it is notorious the use of the more complete sequence with the four phases. Naturally, from the phase of [[Anticipation]] it is possible to get back to [[Relaxation]], if [[Engagement]] is avoided.</mt>
+| ex1=<mt p="RAED" g="Far Cry 2" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}">In this game it is notorious the use of the complete sequence with the four phases. Naturally, from the phase of [[Anticipation]] it is possible to get back to [[Relaxation]], if [[Engagement]] is avoided.</mt>
 | ex2=<mt p="RAED" g="NFSUndercover" g="Need for Speed: Undercover" w="{{R16by9W}}" h="{{R16by9H}}>In these example the sequence "Relaxation → Engagement → Decay" is perceptible.</mt>
 | ex3=<mt p="RAED" g="Papa Sangre" w="{{ViPhoneH}}" h="{{ViPhoneW}}">A three-phase sequence is perceptible. What is more, if we opt to interpret that there is never exactly an [[Engagement]] – in this game the actual [[Engagement]] is equal to [[Death]] – but instead a possible second degree of [[Anticipation]] (of getting caught, once spotted and if not able to outrun the pursuer), then the sequence is more like: "... → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → Anticipation → Decay → Relaxation → ...".</mt>